Kochi exports, and export accounting has its own failure modes: an invoice raised in dollars and received at a different rate, a weight that changes between the godown and the container because the pepper dried, and paperwork that has to agree with a shipping bill somebody else prepared.
| Element | USD | Rate | ₹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Invoice value | 48,600.00 | 84.20 | 40,92,120.00 |
| Received | 48,600.00 | 83.65 | 40,65,390.00 |
| Exchange loss | — | -0.55 | -26,730.00 |
With payment of tax or under LUT without it — different documents with different refund consequences, treated as different things.
Invoiced at one rate, received at another, with the exchange difference posted to the ledger rather than distorting the customer’s balance.
Weight lost between godown and container recorded as a stock adjustment rather than an unexplained gap.
Spices and rubber priced by grade, with the grade on the document so a claim has a reference.
Batch-wise stock at a cold store, with the store as its own warehouse.
Invoice, packing list and the figures that have to agree with the shipping bill.
The invoice is raised at the rate on the day and the receipt recorded at the rate actually realised, with the difference posted as exchange gain or loss to the ledger. It does not sit in the customer’s balance pretending to be an unpaid amount, which is the usual failure.
Recorded as a stock adjustment when it is noticed, so the shrinkage is a visible cost rather than an unexplained difference between what you bought and what you shipped.
Yes, as two distinct document types. They have different refund consequences and treating them as one is a common error that surfaces months later when the refund does not arrive.
Yes, as a warehouse of your company. It is your stock wherever it is physically sitting, and it should be on your books accordingly.
Start free, raise an export invoice in USD, and see the exchange difference land where it belongs.