Migrations fail on expectations rather than on technology. So here is the honest shape of it: masters and opening balances always come across, historical vouchers usually do, and itemised transaction history does not — in this product or any other.
Groups, ledgers, items, units and warehouses, imported and checked before anything financial is brought in.
Reconciled against your old trial balance to the rupee. Nothing else is imported until they agree.
Tally and Busy Day Book vouchers come across as balanced journals with exact totals, so ledger history and period figures are right.
Line-level detail of historical invoices, custom report layouts, and any source-specific customisation. Most businesses keep the old file as an archive for closed years.
You set the document series and starting number, so your invoice numbering carries on unbroken — a GST point, not a cosmetic one.
Run both systems for a month and compare the trial balance. It is the cheapest reassurance available and we recommend it.
No. Historical vouchers arrive as balanced journals with exact totals rather than as itemised invoices with lines, HSN codes and tax splits. Period figures and party ledgers are correct; the line detail stays in your old system, which is why most businesses keep it as an archive.
Not directly — there is no Marg importer, and we would rather say so here than during onboarding. Parties, items, batch stock and balances move as CSV with our team running the first import, normally inside a week.
A financial year boundary, almost always. Opening balances are clean, comparatives are meaningful, and the numbering is straightforward. Mid-year moves are where migrations get painful.
It is quoted separately from the software and depends on what you are moving from and how much. It is on every written quote rather than being a surprise later.
Import your parties and items free this week, and see how much of the work is already done.