Agri trading has costs generic software has never heard of: bardana, hamali, mandi fees, commission, and a weight that shrinks between purchase and sale because the grain dried out. Any of them unaccounted for and the margin on paper is fiction.
| Element | Qty / rate | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Gross weight | 284.60 qtl | — |
| Less: bardana | 2.84 qtl | — |
| Net weight @ 2,340 | 281.76 qtl | 6,59,318.40 |
| Hamali & mandi fee | — | 18,420.00 |
| Commission @ 2% | — | 13,186.37 |
Gross, bardana deduction and net weight recorded against the kanta slip, so the purchase matches the weighbridge and not an estimate.
Moisture, foreign matter and grade adjusting the rate at purchase, recorded on the document so a dispute has a reference.
Bardana, hamali, mandi fee and commission booked into the landed cost rather than left as general expenses at the end of the month.
Weight lost to drying between purchase and sale recorded as a stock adjustment, so the loss is a number rather than an unexplained gap.
Accounts for arhtiyas and agents, with commission payable tracked per transaction.
Stock by godown and by stack, valued at landed cost, with the ledger and the physical position reconcilable.
Yes — gross weight, bardana deduction and net weight are recorded on the purchase against the slip number, so the entry matches the weighbridge rather than a rounded figure.
As part of the landed cost of the purchase rather than as general expenses. That is the difference between knowing your real cost per quintal and discovering at year end that the margin was smaller than it looked.
Recorded as a stock adjustment when it is noticed, so the shrinkage is a visible cost rather than an unexplained difference between what you bought and what you sold.
Yes, as parties with commission payable tracked per transaction, so what is owed to an arhtiya is on the ledger rather than in a diary.
Start free, enter a purchase with its bardana, hamali and commission, and see the real landed cost per quintal.